FOLLOWCHRIST.info
Last modified: 30 November 2007
|
The visible church
"Committed" members of today's so-called Christian denominations are aware that besides them ("believers", "converted ones", "devoted ones") there are also "pseudo-religious ones" or "Sunday's Christians" in the "church" who have not decided yet for Jesus or will not ever do that. Also the latter ones take part in the community-meetings, they pray, sing and celebrate the Lord's Supper together with the others although they do not have relationship with Jesus. How is it possible? Is it all right so, or do we have to do with a situation that contradicts the teaching of the Bible? The today's situation is often explained by the teaching of the so-called "invisible church". It can be summarized as follows: ACCORDING TO THIS TEACHING:
They try to trace this teaching back to specific Bible-passages, which we will elaborate later. However, at first we would like to point out, on the base of other passages, how far the above teaching and practice are from the order of values of the Bible. Only a believer can be the member of a Christian community and no-one who has not decided for Jesus and is satisfied with his (spiritual) state.(2) THE SITUATION OF THE FIRST COMMUNITY About the first community in Jerusalem, which came to existence after Peter's sermon at Pentecost we can read the following:
The fact that no one else dared join them means neither that the Christians formed an isolated community nor that they kept out those who were willing to join them. We can see how eagerly they evangelised and how God increased the community with those who were to be saved (Acts 2:47). By the others, we have to understand those who did not want to serve Jesus with their whole life. The Christians' evangelism and life made the people decide. Those who converted through them joined them. It was not so that a multitude of people joined from among whom some really had decided to follow Jesus and others either repented after years or decades, or they practised religious forms till the end of their life. The first Christian community did not know this problem: what to do with the unbelieving members who are present in masses since it was simply impossible that an unbeliever became the member of the community without repentance. If an unbeliever came to the community, everybody assessed the "secrets of his heart".
The whole community endeavoured that the "visitor" would understand what he had to repent from. This process was in one case shorter and in another case longer. If, however, the "visitor" did not want to convert by hearing the assessment of the Christians, there was obviously no base to baptise him. Nor did he join or take part in the fellowship. It occurred, nevertheless, that through the evangelism such ones joined as Simon the sorcerer. It seems that Philip did not realise that, among the many converts, Simon's thinking hadn't changed and thus he succeeded in deluding also the other Christians for some time. This, however, came to light soon and Peter behaved in a very resolute way:
We see a similarly strict acting also in such cases when some men slipped in the community, who lived or thought in a different way to what Jesus and the apostles taught.
Jude's aim was to express that these men have no place in the community. Even though it occurred that somebody came to the community, who did not fit in, from the above we can see that his presence was possible for short time only and it was not at all regarded as normal. The writers of the letters always admonished the communities to fight against and to separate from such persons (Acts 20:31; Matthew 24:23-26; 1Timothy 4:1-3; 6:3-5; 2 Timothy 3:1-9; 1 John 2:18-19). PURITY AND HOLINESS OF THE COMMUNITY If a member of the community sinned in such a way that he became unworthy of the fellowship with the saints and he did not want to change from his sins in spite of repeated help and admonitions, the community ceased the fellowship with him: excluded him. This was based on Jesus' command:
Concerning treating one as a pagan or a tax collector it ought to be remarked that the Jews did not have fellowship with gentiles because they considered them as unclean (Acts 10:28). They thought in a similar way also about the greedy tax collectors, who compromised with the Romans (Matthew 9:10-11). This categorical rejection was not correct, yet this was the Jewish practice. Jesus bases on this fact showing what the real sense of separation is: the reason for it should not be the social or national state of the other one but the fact that he does not accept help and wants to remain in his sin.
Some verses later Paul goes on like this:
Somebody might ask: "Where is mercy here? Where is patience? Did not Paul have hope that God would still open the heart of this sinner?" Yes he did! (4) However, even though he considered it as possible he binds belonging to the community to severe conditions. God's community cannot have fellowship with the one who clings to sin. However, if he later repents he can return to the community with the new decision that he wants to live a holy, pure life. The first Christian communities guarded their purity in this way. In this way it was possible that there weren't unbelievers among them. If it had not been, so how could Paul call his addresses saints? (E.g. 1 Corinthians 1:1-3; 2 Corinthians 1:1-2)(5) In the NT the term "saint" has the same meaning as "Christian" (Acts 9:13; Ephesians 5:3; Philippians 4:21-22; Hebrews 3:1). All Christians are saints and only those can belong to the church who let them be sanctified and let God reign in their life (Hebrews 12:14; Ephesians 5:5; Galatians 5:19-21). Not sinless people are meant (this is visible especially in the letters to the Corinthians) but such people "who are sanctified in Christ Jesus", who accepted Jesus' forgiveness and redemption. Even if they happen to sin they will listen to the admonition and want to change. The whole church and each member of it fights against sin. A Christian cannot live a double-life. He cannot serve God while his heart is in the world. In the same way neither can the church give room to sinners, who do not want to change (Matthew 6:24; Matthew 10:38-39; James 4:4; 1 John 2:15-17; John 12:25-26; 1 John 2:4-6). If Christians do not separate themselves from worldly people but have fellowship with them, they show a false image to the outsiders. Furthermore, they deceive also those "religious ones" who consider themselves Christians (what is understandable from the above). Finally, they themselves also break away from God.
God can receive as his children those who separate themselves from the unbelievers.(6) Also the meaning of Greek word ecclesia means community that is called out. This hints at the custom that the messengers of ancient Greek towns used to call out the citizens from their houses for the official assemblies. Thus, also the messengers of the Gospel call out God's community from the world. We can see from the above that the practice of the first Christian communities was totally different from that of the nowadays' denominations. Today everybody can become a member of the "church" (after some formalities) and usually exclusion is not practised either. For these things, a more intensive fellowship would be necessary: they should deal more with one another, they should follow each other's life with attention. The thinking of today's religious people is like this: "That is right but: Who has time for this nowadays?" "We live in the 21st century." (That means: Who has time in the 21st century to fulfil Christ's command?!) THE PARABLE OF THE WHEAT AND WEED The wrong practice, however, did not begin just in our days, and so also the theoretical support of it (= the teaching of the invisible church) came to existence already early. The process was matched by the (parallel) profaning of the church. As the community backed away more and more from God and the holy life so its sensitivity against sin decreased. Already in the 4th century, in the Donatistic controversy, Augustine misused a Biblical passage to uphold the readmission of apostatised bishops into the church: the interest created the false teaching. Augustine claimed, on the base of the parable of wheat and weed (Matthew 13:24-30.36-43) and the parable of the net (Matthew 13:47-50), that the community is a "mixed body" (corpus permixtum), in which the evil coexists with the righteous.
Augustine identified the field and the net with the community disregarding that Jesus himself interpreted his own parable in a different way!!!
According to v. 38 the field is identical to the world. The one, who refers the field to the community on the base of the parable about the wheat and weed, acknowledges that his community is one with the world. Paul, however, writes to the visible community of Philippi as follows:
The community is in the world, it lights in it and therefore it cannot be identical with it! If in Matthew 13:41 the Son of Man nevertheless collects the evildoers from his kingdom, then - considering the facts above - the kingdom of the Son of Man we should refer to the created world - since Jesus is Lord of the whole world - and not to the community. Similarly, neither does the parable of the net refer to the community. Just because of the fact that he [Jesus] compares the kingdom of heaven with the net it does not necessarily follow that the net means the community. In other parables he compares the kingdom of heaven to a king, a merchant etc. Of course nobody thinks that the king or the merchant would symbolise the community. Jesus used the expression "kingdom of heaven" when he wanted to explain something concerning God's Kingdom. "God's Kingdom" (in Matthew: "Kingdom of Heaven") meant for the Jews the kingdom of the Messiah. Jesus mainly wanted to correct the wrong images about it with his parables. The Jews in Jesus's time expected from the messiah to act as a glorious king and just judge: to deliver his people from the foreign oppression and to extinguish the evil from the earth (cf. the words of John the Baptist: Luke 3,7-9). Jesus wanted to correct this thinking: he had not come to reign as an earthly king or to execute judgement. The judgement will be on the last day and till then good and evil have to coexist in the world. His kingdom is a spiritual one that has overcome the world in a spiritual way:
OTHER MISINTERPRETED PASSAGES - CONTINUATION FOOTNOTES1. Back J. Calvin formulated the teaching of invisible church as follows: "I have observed that the Scriptures speak of the Church in two ways. Sometimes when they speak of the Church they mean the Church as it really is before God - the Church into which none are admitted but those who by the gift of adoption are sons of God, and by the sanctification of the Spirit true members of Christ. In this case it not only comprehends the saints who dwell on the earth, but all the elect who have existed from the beginning of the world. Often, too, by the name of Church is designated the whole body of mankind scattered throughout the world, who profess to worship one God and Christ, who by baptism are initiated into the faith; by partaking of the Lord's Supper profess unity in true doctrine and charity, agree in holding the word of the Lord, and observe the ministry which Christ has appointed for the preaching of it. In this Church there is a very large mixture of hypocrites, who have nothing of Christ but the name and outward appearance: of ambitious, avaricious, envious, evil-speaking men, some also impurer lives, who are tolerated for a time, either because their guilt cannot be legally established, or because due strictness of discipline is not always observed. Hence, as it is necessary to believe the invisible Church, which is manifest to the eye of God only, so we are also enjoined to regard this Church which is so-called with reference to man, and to cultivate its communion." (Calvin: Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book 4, Chapter 1) 2. Back Of course it is not about inquirers. See the explanation to 1 Corinthians 14. 3. Back It is not that Satan would have a special power to torture the sinner but that he who is not in the community is in the world where - according to the words of Jesus - Satan is the prince (Jn.14:30). The confrontation with the world can lead - in an optimal case - to the destruction of the flesh and to the abandoning the sinful attitude. 4. Back This is clearly visible from 1 Corinthians 5:5: "so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus". 5. Back A similar way of addressing we can see also in other letters: Romans 1:1-7; Philippians 1:1; Colossians 1:1-4; 2 Peter 1:1-4 6. Back See still Peter's Pentecost-sermon: Acts 2:40: "Save yourselves from this corrupt generation!" |
| [Home] | [Top] | [Topics] |
"Scripture taken from the NEW AMERICAN STANDARD BIBLE(r), Copyright © 1960,1962,1963,1968,1971,1972,1973,1975,1977,1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission." (lockman.gospelcom.net) Herewith we give our agreement to put a link of our homepage on any other website. Documents on this website may be distributed in an unchanged and complete form for private use. Publishing or using these documents in any other form or for any other purpose is only permitted subject to our agreement. This Web site may contain links to Internet sites maintained by third parties. By providing these links, we are not endorsing, adopting or agreeing with any of the content of the linked sites. [IE6 or higher][1024x768][True Color][Full Screen(F11)] |